The Center for the Protection of Intellectual Property (CPIP) at Antonin Scalia Law School, George Mason University, has partnered with the World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) to host the WIPO-CPIP Summer School on Intellectual Property.
This exclusive, two-week summer course will be held in Arlington, Virginia—just minutes from Washington, D.C., one of the world’s key centers of IP law and policymaking. The course provides a unique opportunity for students, professionals, and government officials to work with leading experts and gain a deeper knowledge of IP to advance their careers.
The course consists of lectures, case studies, simulation exercises, and group discussions on selected IP topics, with an orientation towards the interface between IP and other disciplines. A certificate of participation is awarded to participants who successfully complete the course requirements.
CPIP Scholars Join Letter to Antitrust Chief Applauding DOJ’s New Evidence-Based Approach to IP Enforcement
On February 13, 2018, scholars from the Center for the Protection of Intellectual Property (CPIP), along with a group of judges, former judges and government officials, law professors and economists with expertise in antitrust law and patent law, sent a letter to Assistant Attorney General Makan Delrahim applauding his recent announcements that the Antitrust Division of the Department of Justice (DOJ) would now take a balanced, evidence-based approach in applying antitrust law to patent licensing, especially to patented innovations that have been contributed to technological standards.
Signatories to the letter include Judge Douglas H. Ginsburg of the D.C. Circuit, former Chief Judge Paul Michel of the Federal Circuit, former FTC Commissioner Joshua D. Wright, and former Director of the U.S. Patent & Trademark Office David Kappos, among others.
“This letter to AAG Makan Delrahim from judges, former judges and government officials, legal scholars and economists is very important,” said Adam Mossoff, Professor of Law at Antonin Scalia Law School of George Mason University, and one of the signers of the letter. “It makes clear the necessity of evidence-based, balanced policy-making by government officials whose regulatory actions directly impact the hundreds of millions in R&D investments and the resulting technological products and services that drive our innovation economy. We would not buy computers or smartphones built entirely on the basis of unproven theories, and the government policies that control the development and sale of these products in the marketplace should equally be based on solid evidence of the role of patented innovation in benefiting consumers.”
To read the letter, please click here.
CPIP Co-Hosts Best Practices in Rights Clearance Symposium at Scalia Law
The Arts & Entertainment Advocacy Clinic, the Journal of International Commercial Law, and the Center for the Protection of Intellectual Property at Scalia Law co-hosted an academic symposium on the best practices in rights clearance at Scalia Law on January 18, 2018.
This symposium brought together scholars, industry representatives, and visual artists for a lively discussion about when and whether rights need to be cleared when using the work of others.
During the networking reception that followed the event, student attorneys from the Arts & Entertainment Advocacy Clinic at Scalia Law were available to consult one-on-one with attendees about copyright questions they may have and to help them assess whether it might be fruitful to refer their matter for further advice to the Washington Area Lawyers for the Arts (or a Volunteer Lawyers for the Arts organization in their area).
To visit our Symposium website, please click here.
CPIP Scholars File Amicus Brief in RecogniCorp. v. Nintendo Urging Supreme Court to Fix Section 101
On December 4, 2017, CPIP Founder Adam Mossoff and CPIP John F. Witherspoon Legal Fellow David Lund filed an amicus brief urging the Supreme Court to grant certiorari in RecogniCorp. v. Nintendo. The amicus brief was joined by several law professors, including Richard Epstein and Michael Risch, as well as CPIP Senior Scholars Chris Holman, Kristen Osenga, Mark Schultz, and Ted Sichelman. Bob Sachs of Robert R. Sachs P.C. served as counsel of record.
The technology at issue involves a method of encoding and decoding composite facial images on a computer. The invention solved the problem of decreased image quality when such images are transmitted digitally. RecogniCorp sued Nintendo for patent infringement, and Nintendo challenged the eligibility of the patent under Section 101. Applying the Mayo-Alice framework, the district court held that invention was ineligible subject matter because it was directed to an abstract idea and lacked an inventive concept. Agreeing with that analysis, the Federal Circuit affirmed.
The amici argue that the Supreme Court should grant certiorari in this case in order to correct the continued misapplication of the Mayo-Alice test by the Federal Circuit, the district courts, and the Patent & Trademark Office. By breaking down claims into individual elements and then generalizing them in broad terms, the lower courts and the PTO are failing to properly consider the claimed invention as a whole.
To read the amicus brief, please click here.
George Mason Law Review Publishes Papers From CPIP’s Fourth Annual Fall Conference
The George Mason Law Review has just published the papers from our Fourth Annual Fall Conference, Intellectual Property & Global Prosperity, which was held at Antonin Scalia Law School, George Mason University, in Arlington, Virginia, on October 6-7, 2016.
The conference highlighted the importance of IP rights in the global marketplace and discussed how countries that leverage the availability of such protections enjoy creative, technological, and economic benefits far surpassing those that place less value on IP.
The newly-published papers are listed below:
- Kristina M. L. Acri, née Lybecker, Economic Growth and Prosperity Stem from Effective Intellectual Property Rights, 24 Geo. Mason L. Rev. 865 (2017)
- Walter G. Park, Averting a “Tripsxit” From the Global Intellectual Property System, 24 Geo. Mason L. Rev. 883 (2017)
- Stan Liebowitz, The Case for Copyright, 24 Geo. Mason L. Rev. 907 (2017)
- Brett Danaher & Michael D. Smith, Digital Piracy, Film Quality, and Social Welfare, 24 Geo. Mason L. Rev. 923 (2017)
- Kevin Madigan & Adam Mossoff, Turning Gold Into Lead: How Patent Eligibility Doctrine is Undermining U.S. Leadership in Innovation, 24 Geo. Mason L. Rev. 939 (2017)
- Jiarui Liu, The Predatory Effects of Copyright Piracy, 24 Geo. Mason L. Rev. 961 (2017)
To read our blog post summarizing the papers, please click here.